Press, media & communications
This page provides a neutral, template-style orientation for journalists, editors, conference organizers and communication teams who wish to engage around AI governance themes associated with the International Institute of AI Governance (IIAIG) concept. All content here is informational and does not constitute endorsements, investment promotion, legal advice, regulatory guidance or contractual commitments.
- Treat the boilerplate, structures and examples below as templates. Replace all placeholders with accurate, up-to-date facts validated from authoritative sources before publication.
- For any concrete story, feature, panel or interview, use your organization’s designated media contacts and approval workflows; adapt the inquiry structure on this page as needed.
- Media material should not be interpreted as legal, regulatory, financial, immigration or investment advice, nor as a guarantee of recognition, accreditation or licensing in any jurisdiction.
Template media boilerplate for AI governance context
The text below is a sample boilerplate that illustrates how AI governance themes can be described in concise, neutral media language. It is a starting point only and must be adapted and fact-checked before inclusion in any real-world publication or announcement.
Illustrative press boilerplate (template text – not for direct use without review)
This paragraph demonstrates tone and structure only. Replace bracketed placeholders and generic descriptions with verified, context-specific information aligned with your own governance, policies and disclosures.
About the International Institute of AI Governance (IIAIG)
The International Institute of AI Governance (IIAIG) is presented as a professional concept focused on
advancing responsible, human-centred approaches to artificial intelligence governance. It emphasizes
neutral frameworks, professional conduct and practice-oriented guidance for organizations and individuals
working with AI systems across sectors. Through conceptual certification architectures, orientation
materials on governance and risk, and practitioner-focused events, the IIAIG model aims to support informed
human decision-making about AI while respecting the roles of regulators, universities, employers and other
authorities. Descriptions of IIAIG on this site are informational in nature and do not themselves create
legal, regulatory, accreditation or employment rights.
When adapting this boilerplate, ensure that any claims (for example, registrations, locations, partnerships, recognitions, regulatory interactions) are supported by current, verifiable facts from primary documentation and your official records.
Conceptual types of press & media materials
The cards below outline typical press and media material categories in a neutral way. They illustrate structure and purpose only; they do not indicate that such materials currently exist or are available for any specific organization.
Structured announcements about milestones, publications, events or initiatives related to AI governance themes. Should clearly indicate date, scope, contact details and the limitations of the announcement, including relevant disclaimers.
Curated sets of logos, neutral boilerplate, spokesperson bios and sample questions that help journalists frame AI governance stories accurately and responsibly, avoiding overstatement or implied endorsements.
Short, context-aware quotes providing neutral perspective on AI governance topics. Should avoid speculation, legal advice, promises of recognition or statements outside the spokesperson’s remit or expertise.
Structured conversations, podcasts or panels where AI governance topics are discussed with clear disclaimers and transparent roles, reflecting personal or professional views rather than regulatory or legal positions.
Any real-world media program should include document control for official materials and clear archiving or withdrawal of outdated content, especially when topics intersect with regulation or public trust.
Template structure for AI governance-related press releases
The table and example summary below illustrate how a press release might be structured when communicating about AI governance themes in a neutral way. Replace placeholders with verified information before use in any real distribution.
| Section | Purpose (template) | Illustrative content (placeholder) |
|---|---|---|
| Headline | Concise, factual description of the central news item. | “[Organization] publishes neutral AI governance framework orientation note” |
| Dateline | City and date of release. | [City], [Country] – [YYYY-MM-DD] |
| Lead paragraph | What has happened, for whom it matters, and why it is relevant. | Brief explanation that a new or updated AI governance orientation resource is available, who it is for, and its neutral, non-binding nature. |
| Details & context | High-level description of content, scope and limitations. | Clarifies which sectors, roles or scenarios the material addresses; reaffirms that external authorities retain their own decision-making powers. |
| Quotes (optional) | Short remarks from designated spokespersons, carefully framed to avoid legal advice or promises. | Neutral framing on why AI governance matters, highlighting responsibility, uncertainty and human oversight. |
| Boilerplate | Standard background section on the organization. | Adapted form of the template boilerplate above. |
| Media contact | Clear contact channel for follow-up questions. | Email and/or phone for media inquiries only (template). |
In practice, ensure each press release is reviewed for accuracy, alignment with governance and compliance policies, and appropriate disclaimers before distribution through any channel.
Template guidance for spokesperson roles and media quotes
The guidance below outlines neutral, principles-based expectations for how quotes and commentary might be framed in AI governance coverage, reducing confusion about authority, endorsement and scope.
Intended scope of media commentary
- Focus on conceptual explanations of AI governance principles, oversight patterns and risk-management approaches.
- Clarify when comments reflect a personal or professional view rather than a regulatory, governmental or employer mandate.
- Encourage nuanced discussion of trade-offs, uncertainty and implementation challenges, including the limits of current frameworks.
- Direct questions involving law, regulation, visas, licensing, tax or financial products to qualified experts and appropriate authorities.
What commentary should avoid
- Avoid providing legal, regulatory, immigration, tax or investment advice in media interviews or articles.
- Avoid definitive claims about recognition, accreditation or licensing outcomes in any jurisdiction.
- Avoid suggesting that AI governance frameworks presented on this site are official standards or substitutes for external regulation.
- Avoid implying that any third party endorses, accredits or is affiliated with an initiative unless that relationship is documented and publicly verifiable.
Any real-world media policy should designate spokespersons, approval workflows and escalation paths for sensitive topics, including AI incidents and emerging regulatory developments.
Template structure for media inquiry & response workflow
The structure below illustrates how media inquiries can be collected and triaged. Replace placeholder references and contact details with the specific channels and workflows used in your environment.
Example information requested from journalists (template)
- Full name, outlet and role (journalist, editor, producer, etc.).
- Publication or platform (print, online, broadcast, podcast, etc.).
- Topic focus and specific AI governance angle you wish to explore.
- Preferred spokesperson profile (for example, practitioner, academic, policy-oriented).
- Format (written Q&A, live interview, recorded panel) and approximate timings.
- Deadlines and any relevant embargo or publication dates.
- Any prior coverage or background documents being referenced.
In a live environment, this information can be collected via a dedicated email address or web form, with clear notices about data handling, privacy and expected response times.
Template media contact block
Replace the lines below with actual media contact channels. Make sure the contact is used only for press/media purposes and that response expectations are realistic and clearly communicated.
Media inquiries (template):
Email: media@[example-domain].org
Phone (optional): +[country code] [number]
This block is illustrative. Actual contact details, office hours and escalation paths should be defined and maintained by the communications function responsible for real-world engagement.
When responding to media inquiries, involve relevant governance, legal, risk and compliance functions where appropriate, especially for topics with regulatory, ethical or reputational sensitivity.
Press & media in AI governance ecosystems of the 2030s
As AI governance matures, media narratives will increasingly intersect with technical infrastructure, assurance processes and global accountability debates. The points below are neutral, forward-looking observations – not commitments, product roadmaps or regulatory forecasts.
From one-off stories to ongoing oversight
Coverage of AI governance may shift from isolated incident reporting toward more continuous oversight of how organizations govern AI systems over time, including patterns of transparency, incident handling and stakeholder engagement – while still respecting confidentiality and legal constraints.
Linking media to assurance artefacts
Journalists and analysts may increasingly reference assurance artefacts – such as AI system registers, audit summaries or governance statements – when available, while recognizing that such documents are scoped, selective and do not replace official regulatory filings or court decisions.
AI-generated media & human editorial control
As AI tools help summarize documents and generate story drafts, editorial standards will need to emphasize attribution, verification and human accountability. AI-generated text cannot be treated as a substitute for original reporting, expert review or fact-checking in AI governance coverage.
Any evolution toward data-rich or AI-assisted media ecosystems should preserve clear distinctions between verified facts, opinion, advisory content and binding legal or regulatory determinations.
Treat this page as a template, not an announcement
Use this page to structure how AI governance-related media communication could look in a professional, neutral and responsibility-aware setting. For any actual announcements or coverage, ensure that each statement is grounded in verified facts, aligned with governing documents, and accompanied by appropriate disclaimers and approvals.
When in doubt about how to frame an AI governance topic in media contexts, prioritize clarity, transparent scope, humility about uncertainty and respect for the distinct roles of regulators, employers, universities and other authorities.